Google Nexus Player

Dell XPS 13 (2015)

Alcatel OneTouch Pop 8 Android tablet

Samsung Galaxy Note Edge

27-inch iMac with 5K Retina Display

Alcatel OneTouch Idol X+

Martian Victory Voice Command Watch

BlackBerry Classic

Dyson Hot + Cool Fan and heater

Kyocera DuraForce tough smartphone

HTC RE mobile action camera

Amazon Kindle (2014)

Amazon Kindle Fire HD 7

808 HEX XL Bluetooth speaker

Belkin Thunderbolt 2 Express Dock HD Review

Kurio Extreme Tablet for Kids

Google Nexus 6

Mazda MX-5 (2015)

Canon EOS Rebel SL1

Google Nexus 9

Acer Aspire Switch 10 2-in-1 notebook

Samsung Galaxy S5 Active

Amazon's same-day delivery service

TomTom RIDER motorcycle GPS

ASUS S1 Pocket Projector

Nokia Lumia 830

iPad mini 3

iPad Air 2

Mac OS X Yosemite

Motorola Moto G (2014)

Dyson DC78 Turbinehead Animal vacuum

BlackBerry Passport

Saeco Minuto

Martian Notifier watch

Runtastic Orbit fitness tracking wearable

iPhone 6 Plus

iPhone 6

Moto 360

Moto X (2014)

Mazda CX-5 2015

MacPhun Software's Lost Photos

Parrot Zik Yellow Gold bluetooth headphones

Henge Docks Vertical Docking Station for MacBook Pro

Toshiba Canvio AeroMobile Wireless SSD

Sodastream's Home Carbonation System

TomTom Go 500 GPS

Nio Tag

Jabra ROX Wireless in-ear headphones

SEIDIO's Innocell adds battery life for iPhone5/5S

Parrot Asteroid SMART

Apple 13-inch MacBook Air (2014)

ASUS PB287 4K monitor

Hyundai Santa Fe XL 2014

Tech Armor SlimProtect Case for iPhone 5/5s

Roku Streaming Stick

Belkin QODE "Thin Type" keyboard case for the iPad Air

RFID fraud-proof HuMn wallet

Motorola Moto E

Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet

Sony Xperia Z2

Sony SRS-X9 ultra premium personal speaker

Shiny Soap frees up space on Macs with one click

Hyundai Veloster Turbo 2014

Arts Your Case StrongFit Silicon case for iPhone 5/5S

Fugoo Style Bluetooth Speakers

Red Clock app for iPhone weather and alarm

ASUS ZenBook UX310

Dyson DC62 Hand-Held Vacuum

Philips AirFryer

Alcatel OneTouch Idol X

Nomad ChargeKey for iPhone

Apple Mac Pro (2013)

Kensington Comercio soft folio case for iPad Air

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Micro Four Thirds camera

Jawbone UP24 Fitness Tracker

Dell Venue 8 Pro's wireless keyboard and case


Logitech Ultrathin Bluetooth keyboard for Apple's iPad Air

Honeywell HFD320 AirGenius 5 Air Cleaner & Odor Reducer

Dell Venue 8 Pro Tablet

TomTom US & Canada App for Android

Withings Pulse fitness tracker

Sonos PLAY:1 wireless streaming speaker

« PaWuv 1.0 App locates pet friendly hotels | Main | Samsung is going for the Hi-Fi speaker and dock segment »

The Apple Beat: Apple wins patent infringement case against Samsung, awarded $1 billion in damages

Text and photos by Gadjo Cardenas Sevilla

Apple Inc. has been vindicated in its unprecedented patent case against rival Samsung. The nine-member jury at the San Jose Federal court ruled for Apple  today in the case that began in April 2011. The landmark case revolved around Samsung's copying of Apple's design and functionality in its iPhone and iPad devices. Apple was not found guilty of any of the instances of patent infringement charged by Samsung.

After days of deliberation, the Jury decided in Apple's favour earlier today and as a result ordered that Samsung pay Apple more than $1 billion in damages after finding Samsung was guilty of "willful" violations of a number of Apple's patents in the creation of its own mobile products. The news comes at a milestone date for Apple and its CEO Tim Cook.

It was a year ago today that Steve Jobs officially resigned as Apple's CEO and passed the leadership of the Apple Inc. to Tim Cook. The date is certain to now hold some relevance to Apple, which just last week was acknowledged as the most valuable company of all time with a market cap of $ 620 billion. 

The turning point of the case was likely the presentation of an internal 132-page document written in 2010 by Samsung's engineers.  That document showed a blatant feature-by-feature comparison of theiPhone and Samsung's competing models and recommending how Samsung should make their devices more like Apple's.

The basic argument that Apple presented in the Samsung case is that before the iPhone's launch in 2007, Samsung's products looked very different and lacked the multi-touch and large screen functionality as well as the icon-driven operating system caused confusion in the market and allowed Samsung to profit from Apple's design and engineering.

The Apple vs. Samsung case is part of a larger series of patent cases in the highly competitive and extremely profitable mobile industry.

The real showdown here is between Apple and Google for patents and designs pertaining to the mobile operating systems that run smartphones and tablets.  

This same argument can now be used by Apple against LG, Motorola, HTC and any other handset maker that has released smartphones based on Google's Android OS.

The result of this case against Samsung, one of Apple's biggest rivals and a major Google hardware partner could set the precedent for other patent and trade dress related cases.

In a statement released after the verdict, Apple stated that, "the lawsuits between Apple and Samsung were about much more than patents or money.  They were about values.  At Apple, we value originality and innovation and pour our lives into making the best products on earth. We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy.  We applaud the court for finding Samsung’s behavior willful and for sending a loud and clear message that stealing isn’t right.”

Samsung's reaction to the verdict was  far less cordial, “Today’s verdict should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer,” Samsung said . “It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices."

An appeal from Samsung is all but guaranteed, so this saga will continue. “This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple’s claims,” Samsung said in a report from All Things D.

Apple is currently being sued by Motorola Mobility for mobile patent infringement. Motorola was purchased by Google earlier this year and many analysts believe that Google was after that smartphone maker's mobile patents precisely so it could defend itself against its competitors. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>